Contact Us Today (303) 665-9845

Blog

How Much Can Three Examples Enable?

Posted by James Juo | Jul 03, 2023 | 0 Comments

Though a patent specification need not always “describe with particularity how to make and use every single embodiment within a claimed class,” it must nevertheless “enable the full scope of the invention as defined by its claims,” for example by “disclosing [a] general quality” of the class that...

What Collaboration for Joint Inventors

Posted by James Juo | Jun 29, 2023 | 0 Comments

“People may be joint inventors even though they do not physically work on the invention together or at the same time, and even though each does not make the same type or amount of contribution.” Falana v. Kent State Univ., 669 F.3d 1349, 1357 (Fed. Cir. 2012). “The interplay between conception an...

Copyrights and Trade Dress Are Not Mutually Exclusive

Posted by James Juo | Jun 27, 2023 | 0 Comments

In Jason Scott Collection, Inc. v. Trendily Furniture, LLC, No. 21-16978, — F.4th — (9th Cir. May 30, 2023), the Ninth Circuit recently reiterated that copyright and trademark claims are not mutually exclusive. See, e.g., Wal-Mart Stores v. Samara Bros., 529 U.S. 205, 208 (2000) (involving claims...

Conceptual Strength of Composite Marks with Common Segments

Posted by James Juo | Jun 27, 2023 | 0 Comments

The existence of third-party registrations for similar goods or services can bear on a mark's conceptual strength. Juice Generation, Inc. v. GS Enters. LLC, 794 F.3d 1334, 1339 (Fed. Cir. 2015). Specifically, third-party registrations containing an element that is common to both the opposer's and...

BOYS WORLD Serves as Trademark for “Girl Group”

Posted by James Juo | Jun 26, 2023 | 0 Comments

Sometimes an artist's name may “simply identify the source of the performance contained on the record,” which is not enough to establish that the artist's name functions as a mark for the recording. In re Polar Music Int'l AB, 714 F.2d 1567, 221 USPQ 315, 318 (Fed. Cir. 1983); see also In re Spir...

Independent Economic Value of Each Trade Secret in Database

Posted by James Juo | Jun 19, 2023 | 0 Comments

A trade secret must derive independent economic value, actual or potential, from not being generally known to, and not being readily ascertainable by proper means by, other persons who can obtain economic value from its disclosure or use. 18 U.S.C. § 1839(3)(B). Also, a trade secret must be the s...

Shipment Contracts and Personal Jurisdiction

Posted by James Juo | Jun 16, 2023 | 0 Comments

In a shipment contract, a seller is required to ship goods by carrier, but not required to deliver the goods at a particular destination, and the risk of loss passes to the buyer when the seller duly tenders them to the carrier. UCC § 2-509(1)(a). In a destination contract, however, the seller is...

Test Buying Personal Jurisdiction

Posted by James Juo | Jun 15, 2023 | 0 Comments

Whether personal jurisdiction can be established through “test buys” or strawman sales may depend on the district in which those purchases were made. California. In California, a defendant's online sales to a national marketplace do not constitute the kind of California-focused conduct necessary ...

Citation Is No Substitute for Argument in an IPR

Posted by James Juo | Jun 14, 2023 | 0 Comments

PTAB procedure prohibits incorporating arguments by reference from one document into another during an IPR. See 37 C.F.R. § 42.6(a)(3) (“Arguments must not be incorporated by reference from one document into another document. Combined motions, oppositions, replies, or other combined documents are...

Abstraction-Filtration-Comparison of Banana-on-Wall

Posted by James Juo | Jun 13, 2023 | 0 Comments

The “abstraction-filtration-comparison” test determines what “unprotected material should be disregarded when comparing two works” for substantial similarity in copyright infringement. Compulife Software Inc. v. Newman, 959 F.3d 1288, 1303 (11th Cir. 2020); Bateman v. Mnemonics, Inc., 79 F.3d 153...

Section 230 Immunity for Publishing Scam Ads

Posted by James Juo | Jun 12, 2023 | 0 Comments

Section 230 of the Communications Decency Act (the “CDA”), 47 U.S.C. § 230, states that “[n]o provider . . . of an interactive computer service shall be treated as the publisher or speaker of any information provided by another information content provider.” 47 U.S.C. § 230(c)(1). Subject to cert...

When Using Parody as a Source-Identifying Mark

Posted by James Juo | Jun 09, 2023 | 0 Comments

Under Rogers v. Grimaldi, 875 F.2d 994 (2d Cir. 1989), the First Amendment may preclude an infringement claim against an “expressive work” unless the accused use is either (1) not artistically relevant to the underlying work or (2) explicitly misleads consumers as to the source or content of the ...

Hilton Palacio del Rio Hotel Design Kinda Basic

Posted by James Juo | Jun 06, 2023 | 0 Comments

Hotel building designs are akin to the packaging of what is being rendered and sold inside, namely, hotel services; thus, constituting trade dress for such services. In re Palacio Del Rio, Inc., Ser. Nos. 88412764 and 88437801, __ USPQ2d __ (TTAB May 25, 2023); see also In re Seminole Tribe of Fl...

Guitar-Shaped Hotel Is Inherently Distinctive

Posted by James Juo | May 29, 2023 | 0 Comments

A product's design is not inherently distinctive, but a product's packaging can be inherently distinctive. See Two Pesos, Inc. v. Taco Cabana, Inc., 505 U.S. 763, 23 USPQ2d 1081, 1083 (1992); Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. v. Samara Bros., 529 U.S. 205, 54 USPQ2d 1065, 1068 (2000). In Two Pesos, the U.S. ...

The Non-Functional Parts of a Rocking Chair

Posted by James Juo | May 25, 2023 | 0 Comments

Trademark law prohibits registration of “any matter that, as a whole, is functional.” 15 U.S.C. § 1052(e)(5). “A product design or a product feature is considered functional in a utilitarian sense if: (1) it is ‘essential to the use or purpose of the article,' or (2) it ‘affects the cost or quali...

Appreciable Actual Confusion Is More Than Isolated Instances

Posted by James Juo | May 24, 2023 | 0 Comments

Evidence of actual confusion is “often the best evidence of a likelihood of confusion.” King of the Mountain Sports, Inc. v. Chrysler Corp., 185 F.3d 1084, 1092 (10th Cir. 1999); Clicks Billiards, Inc. v. Sixshooters, Inc., 251 F.3d 1252, 1265 (9th Cir. 2001). But isolated instances of actual con...

Clothing and Table Linen Are Not Related Goods

Posted by James Juo | May 23, 2023 | 0 Comments

To find a likelihood of confusion, the respective goods and services need not be identical or even competitive. But there still must be evidence in the record that the goods and services are related. Or that they are marketed in a manner that could give rise to the mistaken belief that they emana...

Not Everything in the World of Insurance is Related

Posted by James Juo | May 22, 2023 | 0 Comments

Finding a likelihood of confusion with the registered CLAIM WATCH and Design mark for “Tracking and monitoring the status of insurance claims for business purposes”; the USPTO had refused to register CLAIM WATCHER for “Health benefit plan services, namely, insurance administration services, namel...

Enablement in the Bargain

Posted by James Juo | May 19, 2023 | 0 Comments

The patent “bargain” describes the exchange that takes place when an inventor receives a limited term of “protection from competitive exploitation” in exchange for bringing “new designs and technologies into the public domain through disclosure” for the benefit of all. Bonito Boats, Inc. v. Thund...

Assessing the Specific Challenged Use of Appropriation Art

Posted by James Juo | May 19, 2023 | 0 Comments

In a 7-2 decision, the U.S. Supreme Court affirmed in Andy Warhol Foundation for Visual Arts, Inc. v. Goldsmith, No. 21-869, __ U.S. __ (May 18, 2023), that the first fair use factor, namely, “the purpose and character of the use” under 17 U.S.C. § 107(1), favored the photographer over the artist...

Software Licensing Services and Education-related Goods

Posted by James Juo | May 18, 2023 | 0 Comments

To find a likelihood of confusion, the goods and services need not be identical or even competitive. Rather, the question is whether the goods and services are marketed in a manner that “could give rise to the mistaken belief that [the] goods emanate from the same source.” Coach Services Inc. v. ...

Aesthetic Functionality in the Sixth Circuit

Posted by James Juo | May 15, 2023 | 0 Comments

Trade dress pertains to the look of a product or its packaging, and may include features such as size, shape, color, or color combinations, texture, graphics, or even particular sales techniques. Two Pesos, Inc. v. Taco Cabana, Inc., 505 U.S. 763, 764 n.1 (1992); Abercrombie & Fitch Stores, Inc. ...

Server Test Lives on in Utah

Posted by James Juo | May 12, 2023 | 0 Comments

Under the Ninth Circuit's “server” test, if a party displayed a copyrighted image that it had stored on its own systems, then it had infringed; but if it displayed that image by merely linking or framing content from other websites, then it was not infringement. See, e.g., Perfect 10, Inc. v. Ama...

Copying and Pasting Prior Art

Posted by James Juo | May 09, 2023 | 0 Comments

In July 2018, UCANN sued Pure Hemp for infringing U.S. Patent No. 9,730,911, which disclosed and claimed various cannabis and CBD formulations. United Cannibis Corp. v, Pure Hemp Collective Inc., No. 1:18-cv-01922-WJM-NYW (D. Colo.). During the litigation, UCANN filed for bankruptcy, which trigge...

  • 11 of 21

Our firm represents clients in intellectual property claims, trademark litigation, copyright litigation, business litigation and more in the following cities and surrounding areas:

Louisville, CO | Denver, CO | Aurora, CO | Littleton, CO | Centennial, CO | Parker, CO | Watkins, CO | Westminster, CO | Arvada, CO | Golden, CO | Boulder, CO | Brighton, CO | Longmont, CO | Loveland, CO | Black Hawk, CO | Idaho Springs, CO | Larkspur, CO | Monument, CO | Fort Collins, CO | Colorado | Springs, CO | Pueblo, CO | Breckenridge, CO

Menu