Contact Us Today (303) 665-9845

Blog

Deceptive ROSE PETALS

Posted by James Juo | Mar 17, 2023 | 0 Comments

A trademark is deceptive under Section 2(a) if: it consists of or comprises a term that misdescribes the character, quality, function, composition, or use of the goods; prospective purchasers are likely to believe that the misdescription actually describes the goods; and the misdescription...

Common Sense Claim Construction

Posted by James Juo | Mar 16, 2023 | 0 Comments

Claim construction interprets a patent claim based on the words in the claim. Construing a claim, however, does not mean redrafting a claim. Chef America In Chef America, Inc. v. Lamb-Weston, Inc., 358 F.3d 1371, 1374 (Fed. Cir. 2004), the patent claimed a process for making baked goods. Id. at 1...

Categorical Improvement Not Required for Obviousness

Posted by James Juo | Mar 15, 2023 | 0 Comments

The motivation-to-combine analysis for obviousness is a flexible one under patent law. “[A]ny need or problem known in the field of endeavor at the time of invention and addressed by the patent can provide a reason for combining the elements in the manner claimed.” KSR Int'l Co. v. Teleflex Inc.,...

Happy π Day

Posted by James Juo | Mar 14, 2023 | 0 Comments

Today, March 14, is Pi Day. As you may recall from your school days, pi is the ratio of a circle's circumference to its diameter. Pi is a mathematical constant and an irrational number. As an “infinite decimal,” the digits (so far) never end after the decimal point. But an estimate of pi to the h...

Commercially Weak and Highly Suggestive PATCHMAN

Posted by James Juo | Mar 13, 2023 | 0 Comments

Two key factors in Section 2(d) cases are the similarity or dissimilarity of the marks and the goods or services. See In re i.am.symbolic, LLC, 866 F.3d 1315, 123 USPQ2d 1744, 1747 (Fed. Cir. 2017); Herbko Int'l, Inc. v. Kappa Books, Inc., 308 F.3d 1156, 64 USPQ2d 1375, 1380 (Fed. Cir. 2002); Fed...

Social Media Evidence Needs Authentication

Posted by James Juo | Mar 08, 2023 | 0 Comments

“Courts have considered social media comments and posts authenticated where the comments were authored by parties or witnesses.” MGA Ent. Inc. v. Harris, No. 2:20-CV-11548-NSA-GRX, 2022 WL 4596697, at *5 (C.D. Cal. July 29, 2022), reconsideration denied, No. 2:20-CV-11548-NSA-GRX, 2022 WL 4596585...

Gruyère Is No ROQUEFORT

Posted by James Juo | Mar 06, 2023 | 0 Comments

A geographic certification mark may feature a recognized geographic term that identifies the relevant geographic region, such as ROQUEFORT for cheese.  Cmty of Roquefort v. William Faehndrich, Inc., 303 F.2d 494, 497, 133 USPQ 633, 635 (2d Cir. 1962). “[C]ertification marks, including indications...

Consumer Review Fairness Act Prohibits Anti-Review Clauses

Posted by James Juo | Mar 03, 2023 | 0 Comments

The Consumer Review Fairness Act (“CRFA”), enacted by Congress in 2016, states that “[i]t shall be unlawful for a person to offer a form contract containing a provision” that “prohibits or restricts the ability of an individual who is a party to the form contract to engage in a covered communicat...

O Collective! My Collective!

Posted by James Juo | Feb 24, 2023 | 0 Comments

A “collective” (such as an association, union, cooperative, fraternal organization, or other organized collective group) may own trademarks for marketing the collective's own goods or services, like any other entity. However, there also are two types of “collective marks.” See 15 U.S.C. § 1127. C...

Trademark Examination Guide 1-23 Regarding Section 2(c)

Posted by James Juo | Feb 23, 2023 | 0 Comments

Pending the USPTO's petition for certiorari to the U.S. Supreme Court to review the Federal Circuit's In re Elster, 26 F.4th 1328, 2022 USPQ2d 195 (Fed. Cir. 2022) decision that Section 2(c) of the Lanham Act, 15 U.S.C. § 1052(c), is unconstitutional, the USPTO will be suspending action on pendin...

Abstract Idea Needs More Than Generic Functional Language

Posted by James Juo | Feb 22, 2023 | 0 Comments

Under the “Alice” test, a claim falls outside § 101 if (1) it is directed to a patent-ineligible concept like an abstract idea, and (2) lacks elements sufficient to transform the claim into a patent-eligible application. SAP Am., Inc. v. InvestPic, LLC, 898 F.3d 1161, 1166–67 (Fed. Cir. 2018) (gr...

Alleging Patent Infringement in Good Faith

Posted by James Juo | Feb 21, 2023 | 0 Comments

“[A] patentee, acting in good faith on its belief as to the nature and scope of its rights, is fully permitted to press those rights ‘even though he may misconceive what those rights are.'” Mikohn Gaming Corp. v. Acres Gaming, Inc., 165 F.3d 891, 897 (Fed. Cir. 1998) (quoting Kaplan v. Helenhart ...

Broadly Preserving the Status Quo

Posted by James Juo | Feb 20, 2023 | 0 Comments

“The purpose of a preliminary injunction is merely to preserve the relative positions of the parties until a trial on the merits can be held.” Univ. of Texas v. Camenisch, 451 U.S. 390, 395 (1981). “Crafting a preliminary injunction is an exercise of discretion and judgment, often dependent as mu...

Exceptional Case Less Severe Sanction Than Rule 11

Posted by James Juo | Feb 17, 2023 | 0 Comments

Under the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, a court may grant Rule 11 sanctions when one improperly certifies a document filed with the court that (1) “is not being presented for any improper purpose, such as to harass, cause unnecessary delay, or needlessly increase the cost of litigation”; (2) ...

RAMEN HOOD and the Common Law

Posted by James Juo | Feb 16, 2023 | 0 Comments

Pending trademark applications for the RAMEN HOOD mark filed by Ramen Hood, LLC, a California company, were suspending in view of earlier-filed trademark applications for RAMEN HOOD composite word-and-design marks filed by Ramenhood LLC, an Arizona company. Both applications were for restaurant s...

Stored Communications Act and Leaving Gmail Open at Work

Posted by James Juo | Feb 15, 2023 | 0 Comments

Under the Stored Communications Act (“SCA”), 18 U.S.C. § 2701, whoever: (1) intentionally accesses without authorization a facility through which an electronic communication service is provided; or (2) intentionally exceeds an authorization to access that facility; and thereby obtains, alt...

Statute of Limitations for Compulsory Counterclaims

Posted by James Juo | Feb 14, 2023 | 0 Comments

The filing of a complaint tolls the statute of limitations for compulsory counterclaims in many courts. See, e.g., Burlington Indus., Inc. v. Milliken & Co., 690 F.2d 380, 389 (4th Cir. 1982); UST Capital Corp. v. Charter Nat'l Life Ins. Co., 684 F. Supp. 757, 759 (D. Mass. 1986). But this conclu...

Cannot Avoid Statute of Limitations Without Diligence

Posted by James Juo | Feb 13, 2023 | 0 Comments

The purpose of the statute of limitations “is to require the reasonably diligent presentation of tort claims.” U.S. v. Kubrick, 444 U.S. 111, 123 (1979); see also Hickerson v. Vessels, 316 P.3d 620, 623–24 (Colo. 2014) (“The purpose of a statute of limitations is to promote justice, discourage un...

Broad Identification of Goods Encompasses the Narrower

Posted by James Juo | Feb 10, 2023 | 0 Comments

A trademark application may be refused under Section 2(d) based on a likelihood of confusion with an existing trademark registration according to the DuPont factors, which includes the relatedness of the respective goods identified in the application and the registration. In re Majestic Distillin...

PTAB Pro Hac Vice

Posted by James Juo | Feb 08, 2023 | 0 Comments

In a proceeding before the Patent Trial and Appeal Board (“PTAB”), a party may be represented by counsel. If so, then the party must designate a lead counsel and at least one back-up counsel who can conduct business on behalf of the lead counsel. 37 C.F.R. § 42.10(a). Lead counsel must be a regis...

Lizzo’s Mark Not 100% That Predominately Ornamental

Posted by James Juo | Feb 06, 2023 | 0 Comments

Slogans, phrases or terms that consumers perceive as “merely informational in nature” are not registrable. In re Brunetti, 2022 USPQ2d 764, at *11 (TTAB 2022); In re Eagle Crest, Inc., 96 USPQ2d 1227, 1229 (TTAB 2010). “Matter may be merely informational and fail to function as a trademark if it ...

Rebinding a Book Does Not Create a Derivative Work

Posted by James Juo | Feb 03, 2023 | 0 Comments

A “derivative work” is created where a preexisting work is “recast, transformed, or adapted.” 17 U.S.C. § 101. Such a derivative work could be a translation, musical arrangement, dramatization, fictionalization, motion picture version, sound recording, art reproduction, abridgement, or condensati...

Copyright for Photo Taken by Someone Else Using Your Camera

Posted by James Juo | Feb 02, 2023 | 0 Comments

“Under normal circumstances, a photographer is the author of his or her photographs. But, as with any general rule, exceptions exist….” Natkin v. Winfrey, 111 F. Supp. 2d 1003, 1008 (N.D. Ill. 2000) (Castillo, J.) (internal quotation omitted) (citing Burrow– Giles Lithographic Co. v. Sarony, 111 ...

Any Whisky in “Natural Whisky & Other Flavors”?

Posted by James Juo | Jan 27, 2023 | 0 Comments

The label for 99-cent bottles of “Fireball Cinnamon” states that it is a “malt beverage with natural whisky & other flavors and caramel color.” So, would the average consumer believe that the distilled spirit of whisky was an ingredient here? Anna Marquez did. And she has filed a class-action law...

Fourth Circuit Joins the ACPA Re-Registration Parade

Posted by James Juo | Jan 25, 2023 | 0 Comments

The Anti-cybersquatting Consumer Protection Act (“ACPA”) was intended to fill the gap between cybersquatting and the traditional likelihood of confusion analysis for trademark infringement. The ACPA applies to whether a domain name was registered in bad faith “at the time of registration of the d...

  • 13 of 21

Our firm represents clients in intellectual property claims, trademark litigation, copyright litigation, business litigation and more in the following cities and surrounding areas:

Louisville, CO | Denver, CO | Aurora, CO | Littleton, CO | Centennial, CO | Parker, CO | Watkins, CO | Westminster, CO | Arvada, CO | Golden, CO | Boulder, CO | Brighton, CO | Longmont, CO | Loveland, CO | Black Hawk, CO | Idaho Springs, CO | Larkspur, CO | Monument, CO | Fort Collins, CO | Colorado | Springs, CO | Pueblo, CO | Breckenridge, CO

Menu