Contact Us Today (303) 665-9845

Blog

Indirect “Chain-of-Events” Use Does Not Show SAAS services

Posted by James Juo | Nov 06, 2024 | 0 Comments

SAAS refers to a method of software delivery and licensing in which software is accessed online via a subscription, rather than bought and installed on individual computers. This type of service may be somewhat similar to downloadable software in International Class 9, but for SAAS, the software resides on the service provider's system. 

A service mark is used in commerce "when it is used or displayed in the sale or advertising of services and the services are rendered in commerce." 15 U.S.C. § 1127; see also In re Universal Oil Prods. Co., 476 F.2d 653, 177 USPQ 456, 457 (CCPA 1973) (“The minimum requirement is some direct association between the offer of services and the mark sought to be registered therefor.”).

A mobile phone screen with a tab that would direct a user to a website, where the user would then receive SAAS services relating to the user's account, could show use of a downloadable mobile phone application, but not SAAS because such an indirect “chain-of-events” type of use would not meet the statutory definition of a service mark. Instead, the relevant service mark use with the SAAS services would appear on the website when the user reaches that site for information on her/his account. 

The TTAB recently affirmed that a specimen of use that displayed the HEARTIFY composite mark in connection with a mobile phone app, did not show use for SAAS services. In re Heartify LLC, Ser. No. 97768868 (TTAB Nov. 4, 2024). Because every specimen showed or provided information about Applicant's mobile phone application, rather than anything resembling SAAS services, the TTAB held that these specimens failed to show use of the mark in connection with the SAAS services. 

About the Author

James Juo

James Juo is an experienced intellectual property attorney. He has successfully litigated various intellectual property disputes involving patents, trademarks, copyrights, and trade secrets. He also has counseled clients on the scope and validity of patent and trademark rights.

Comments

There are no comments for this post. Be the first and Add your Comment below.

Leave a Comment

Our firm represents clients in intellectual property claims, trademark litigation, copyright litigation, business litigation and more in the following cities and surrounding areas:

Louisville, CO | Denver, CO | Aurora, CO | Littleton, CO | Centennial, CO | Parker, CO | Watkins, CO | Westminster, CO | Arvada, CO | Golden, CO | Boulder, CO | Brighton, CO | Longmont, CO | Loveland, CO | Black Hawk, CO | Idaho Springs, CO | Larkspur, CO | Monument, CO | Fort Collins, CO | Colorado | Springs, CO | Pueblo, CO | Breckenridge, CO

Menu